Re: [PATCH] psql: \dn+ to show size of each schema.. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: [PATCH] psql: \dn+ to show size of each schema..
Date
Msg-id 2c5c19ffe1a812223b2d60b1248ef31e8b51caaa.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] psql: \dn+ to show size of each schema..  (Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] psql: \dn+ to show size of each schema..  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: [PATCH] psql: \dn+ to show size of each schema (and \dA+ for AMs)  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 14:05 +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> 2021年7月14日(水) 12:07 Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>:
> > \db+ and \l+ show sizes of tablespaces and databases, so I was surprised in the
> > past that \dn+ didn't show sizes of schemas.  I would find that somewhat
> > convenient, and I assume other people would use it even more useful.
> 
> It's something which would be useful to have. But see this previous proposal:
> 
>    https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2d6d2ebf-4dbc-4f74-17d8-05461f4782e2%40dalibo.com

Right, I would not like to cause a lot of I/O activity just to look at the
permissions on a schema...

Besides, schemas are not physical, but logical containers.  So I see a point in
measuring the storage used in a certain tablespace, but not so much by all objects
in a certain schema.  It might be useful for accounting purposes, though.
But I don't expect it to be in frequent enough demand to add a psql command.

What about inventing a function pg_schema_size(regnamespace)?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: Ian Lawrence Barwick
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] document