Do non-sequential primary keys slow performance significantly?? - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Damian C
Subject Do non-sequential primary keys slow performance significantly??
Date
Msg-id 2bbc8f530609282229o524f573ao4080326a721c0e56@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Do non-sequential primary keys slow performance significantly??
Re: Do non-sequential primary keys slow performance
Re: Do non-sequential primary keys slow performance significantly??
List pgsql-novice
Hello,
The most difficult part of this question is justifying WHY we would
want to use random primary keys!  There is a very strong reason for
doing so, although not quite compelling.

We are Java developers developing desktop applications that persist
data in postgres. This is a pretty "low spec" database as it will only
servicing a few PCs.  We do this via Hibernate so our SQL & Postrges
skills and insights are relatively lacking.  I certainly don't really
understand the gory internal details of postgres.

We have an internal proposal to use what are virtually random 128 bit
numbers for our primary keys.  These are not truley random in any
mathematical sense, and they will be unique, but they are certainly
NOT sequential.

In my ignorant bliss I would suspect that postgres will run more
slowly using random primary keys. Can anyone provide any "rules of
thumb" for how this may effect performance??  Is it a plain dumb
idea?? Or maybe it would have only modest impact??

Any comments, insights, pointers are very much appreciated,

Thanks,
-Damian

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: John Koller
Date:
Subject: Re: tablespace?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Do non-sequential primary keys slow performance significantly??