Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher
Date
Msg-id 2b72c1d3-c19e-9156-fd91-0cb1707aec35@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/27/17 04:06, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Why buildin process has prefix bgworker?

Implementation detail.  This has been changed in master already.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeevan Chalke
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher