[HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRA0HYp2BHxZfy3fPio-cqKEq00ay0+BqeeLc1bb1ZXQNQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher
List pgsql-hackers
Hi

Why buildin process has prefix bgworker?

 1907 ?        Ss    13:00 postgres: ides ides_immaj_prac 192.168.1.50(3524) idle
 1941 ?        Ss     0:05 postgres: ides ides_immaj_prac 192.168.1.50(3527) idle
 3706 ?        Ss     0:00 postgres: ides ides_immaj_prac 192.168.1.50(4012) idle
11924 pts/0    S+     0:00 grep postgres
18710 ?        Ss     0:01 postgres: logger process                             
18712 ?        Ss     0:06 postgres: checkpointer process                       
18713 ?        Ss     0:02 postgres: writer process                             
18714 ?        Ss     0:05 postgres: wal writer process                         
18715 ?        Ss     0:04 postgres: autovacuum launcher process                
18716 ?        Ss     0:39 postgres: stats collector process                    
18717 ?        Ss     0:00 postgres: bgworker: logical replication launcher     
32202 ?        Ss     0:00 postgres: ides postgres 192.168.1.50(3109) idle      
32226 ?        Ss     0:00 postgres: ides ides_immaj_prac 192.168.1.50(3114) idle
32274 ?        Ss     0:00 postgres: ides ides_jmmaj_akt 192.168.1.50(3124) idle

regards

Pavel

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11