Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRC89WQ275zqP_-BY=mLon0qu3t9uS6Di2ML8T7xAQJMeA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


2017-10-27 13:03 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>:
On 10/27/17 04:06, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Why buildin process has prefix bgworker?

Implementation detail.  This has been changed in master already.

ok

Thank you

Pavel

--
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgres 10 manual breaks links with anchors