Re: Missing mention of autovacuum_work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From nikolai.berkoff
Subject Re: Missing mention of autovacuum_work_mem
Date
Msg-id 2a_0HzEWsHbu9VVZKMxdZ-YxVvFqamXG4crWy1xNkE4NIF-VjRuquYqzrNzmq8-2kJorJymk1D7CDbC2JgYA-BBGibPcxzWQ6R1WTtGMacE=@pm.me
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing mention of autovacuum_work_mem  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Missing mention of autovacuum_work_mem
List pgsql-docs
> Why not keep it simple with
>

> "If a table has any indexes, this will happen at least once per vacuum,
>

> after the heap has been completely scanned. It may happen multiple times per
>

> vacuum if maintenance_work_mem (or, in the case of autovacuum,
>

> autovacuum_work_mem) is insufficient to store the number of dead
>

> tuples found."

Thank you Laurenz,

Yes that reads better still.

Regards,

Nikolai
Attachment

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing mention of autovacuum_work_mem
Next
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: Default include_dir behaviour