Re: psql: FATAL: the database system is starting up - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: psql: FATAL: the database system is starting up
Date
Msg-id 2a8309a5-df17-cb8b-840c-278f2d0ac422@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql: FATAL: the database system is starting up  (Tom K <tomkcpr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: psql: FATAL: the database system is starting up
List pgsql-general
On 6/1/19 5:21 PM, Tom K wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 7:34 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com 
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 6/1/19 4:22 PM, Tom K wrote:
>      >
>      >
> 
>      >
>      > Looks like this crash was far more catastrophic then I thought. 
>     By the
>      > looks of things, thinking on psql02 would be my best bet.
>      >
> 
>     The more I look at it the more I think the replication was not doing
>     what you thought it was doing. That psql02 was the primary and that
>     psql01 and psql03 where out of sync and/or defunct standbys.
> 
> 
> Now that I look at the files myself, that's the conclusion I was coming 
> to myself.  Sample config:

The below would be for someone that uses and understands Patroni. That 
would not be me:)

> 
> [root@psql02 base]# cat /etc/patroni.yml
> scope: postgres
> namespace: /db/
> name: postgresql1
> 
> restapi:
>      listen: 192.168.0.124:8008 <http://192.168.0.124:8008>
>      connect_address: 192.168.0.124:8008 <http://192.168.0.124:8008>

> 
> Or perhaps when the system crashed, the filesystem check simply moved 
> the folders out due to corruption.

That would leave the cluster in an inconsistent state and you would not 
have been able to start the one you got going.

-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom K
Date:
Subject: Re: psql: FATAL: the database system is starting up
Next
From: Tom K
Date:
Subject: Re: psql: FATAL: the database system is starting up