Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
Date
Msg-id 2a1e0c9e-8485-dfd8-86b8-a95542deec30@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
List pgsql-bugs
On 5/10/17 09:12, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Looking at 0001 and 0002... So you are correctly blocking nextval()
> when ALTER SEQUENCE holds a lock on the sequence object. And
> concurrent calls of nextval() don't conflict. As far as I can see this
> matches the implementation of 3.
> 
> Here are some minor comments.

Committed after working in your comments.  Thanks!

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14635: Query is executed slower on hot standby slavedatabase then on master database
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Commenting a FK crashes ALTER TABLE statements