> On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12 November 2015 at 17:35, Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov
> <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I'd like to not use postgresql's version number in our artifacts.
> >
>
> I agree. The only issue is the numbering is used on some Maven
> repository sites to indicate new versions. If we go to a version
> number less than the current one, it might not be recognised.
>
> It might be a good opportunity to adopt http://semver.org/ too?
>
> fine with me.
+1 to semver, although it seems unlikely that we'd change the major version (backwards compatibility break)
anytime soon
>
> Does the version number need to be in the artifact name or just the version in the pom?
Nope, just the version -- the artifact name should stay constant
