Re: Release for 9.5 - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Release for 9.5
Date
Msg-id CADK3HH+cwxG8s9fZMtMrzznm4nzMK_oGVKCM7=3jeKWH1F3jYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Release for 9.5  (Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com>)
Responses Re: Release for 9.5  (Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc

On 12 November 2015 at 17:35, Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov
<sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to not use postgresql's version number in our artifacts.
>

I agree. The only issue is the numbering is used on some Maven
repository sites to indicate new versions. If we go to a version
number less than the current one, it might not be recognised.

It might be a good opportunity to adopt http://semver.org/ too?

fine with me.
 
Does the version number need to be in the artifact name or just the version in the pom?
 
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Nelson
Date:
Subject: Re: Release for 9.5
Next
From: Steven Schlansker
Date:
Subject: Re: Release for 9.5