Re: Nonexistent pid in pg_locks - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Joe Uhl
Subject Re: Nonexistent pid in pg_locks
Date
Msg-id 2E0DB33E-5553-4469-A30A-B2F1EB65B233@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Nonexistent pid in pg_locks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Nonexistent pid in pg_locks
List pgsql-bugs
On Jul 8, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Joe Uhl <joeuhl@gmail.com> writes:
>> I had to bounce an OpenMQ broker this morning (this database is the
>> DB
>> for an OpenMQ HA setup) and couldn't get it to reconnect to postgres.
>> On inspecting the database I found dozens of vacuum processes waiting
>> (I have a cron job that vacuums each night) and chewing up connection
>> slots.  Killing those left a few autovacuum worker process waiting.
>> Killing those left just this one orphaned pid apparently holding a
>> lock.  Assumably they were all waiting on the lock "held" by 10453.
>
> What exactly did you do to "kill" those processes?  Do you remember
> whether any of them happened to have PID 10453?

I used "kill pid1 pid2 pid3 ..." (no -9) as root.  Unfortunately I do
not recall if that pid was one of the processes I killed and not
enough scrollback in this screen to see.  It is a
ShareUpdateExclusiveLock lock though and I definitely only killed
vacuum/analyze pids so thinking there is a very high chance of 10453
being one of them.

>
>> Is there any way for me to clear that orphaned entry out of pg_locks?
>
> Restarting the database should take care of this, I think.
>
>             regards, tom lane

I've got a block of time scheduled for tonight to restart, will give
that a shot.  Thanks for the response,

Joe

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Nonexistent pid in pg_locks
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Nonexistent pid in pg_locks