On Mar 20, 2006, at 4:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com> writes:
>> A base backup taken from a running postmaster will still include a
>> postmaster.pid file, which will prevent a new postmaster from being
>> able to be started.
>
> Usually not; only if the PID mentioned in the file belongs to an
> existing process belonging to the postgres userid does Postgres
> believe
> that the pidfile is valid.
>
> It might be worth mentioning this as you suggest, but I think it's a
> sufficiently low-probability case that your failure was probably
> due to
> something else.
My test scenario involved setting up a new cluster on the same
machine as the base postgres I was attempting to recover. So you're
probably right about the rarity.
What about the larger suggested change of breaking that section into
three more granular subsections? I could see commentary being
slightly more helpful for each.
--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Database Architecture and Programming
Co-Founder
Sitening, LLC
http://www.sitening.com/
3004 B Poston Avenue
Nashville, TN 37203-1314
615-260-0005 (cell)
615-469-5150 (office)
615-469-5151 (fax)
