> On 2 May 2023, at 23:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 2 May 2023, at 22:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> mainly because
>>> plperl's spi_exec_prepared uses that name as a caller-exposed hash key.
>
>> But I didn't realize that, and in light of that I agree that limit is better.
>
> OK, let's do it like that then.
>
>>> I'm not especially concerned about the wording otherwise.
>
>> Neither am I, both are fine I think.
>
> I'll compare and merge the two patches and push. Thanks for
> looking at it!
+1, sounds like a good plan.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
