Hi Laurenze,
From the configuration we have, does it mean that the primary will retain 32 WAL's of 1 GB each and then start evicting
thefirst WAL as soon as the last one gets filled? In layman's term, 32GB is huge amount of data and I don't think that
muchchanges during upgrades. In fact the total size of our database is 56 GB. Is my understanding correct?
shared_buffers = 48GB
wal_level = replica
max_prepared_transactions = 200
max_wal_senders = 5
wal_keep_segments = 32
hot_standby = ON
effective_cache_size = 144GB
work_mem = 1GB
maintenance_work_mem = 2GB
wal_buffers = 16MB
min_wal_size = 1GB
max_wal_size = 2GB
Thanks & Regards
Pranjal Shukla
On 3/17/22, 6:50 PM, "Laurenz Albe" <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 12:36 +0000, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
> uring upgrades of our application, we generally shutdown all Secondary servers
> which are getting stream replicated from Primary Servers. This is to maintain
> a copy of database on other servers should
> we wish to revert (of course we take DB Backups too before starting the activity).
> After the application upgrade is done, when we start the secondary, often the
> replication is broken, and we need to
> again setup using pg_basebackup. How do we ensure that secondary is able to
> resume the replication without the need of base back up again?
There are three ways:
1. have a WAL archive and configure "restore_command" on the standby
2. set "wal_keep_size" on the primary high enough
3. use a replication slot
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec |
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com__;!!GjvTz_vk!DWWCoWlC7gBG3UPcdGdgbBT_1hKnCxfiO7qpf7QV1Q-bOqCJ1JkNSBYlD2yvLg$
