Until v. 9.1 enum modification was not officially supported, although hacking pg_enum made it somewhat workable. Since
v.9.1 there is a way to add values to enum types. However,
- alter type ... add value doesn't work in transaction blocks, which severely limits its usefulness
- there is still no supported way to delete values from an enum
Worse still, old hacks for adding enum values no longer work. There are some good technical reasons for all this,
which,for those who are interested, have been discussed recently in psql-bugs.
All the same, I think a better support for enum modification would be very desirable, more so than for other custom
types. The reason has to do with the very nature of an enum - an enumeration, a representation of a set, which, in
general,implies open-endedness. Some sets that may be represented by an enum do not imply extensibility, e.g. days of
theweek (barring another French revolution!) But many more do. In my practice, when considering implementation of a
set-likeentity, extensibility is a crucial consideration.
For those interested in the discussion that led to this post, look for "Problems with ENUM type manipulation in 9.1"
threadin psql-bugs.
Dmitry Epstein | Developer
Allied Testing
T + 7 495 544 48 69 Ext 417
www.alliedtesting.com
We Deliver Quality.
