On Sep 20, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> I think you're missing the point here; I can't control what it
> resolves
> to, since that's the job of the function overload resolution code.
Yeah, but I think that the existing behavior is probably the best.
> But I checked, and delete(hstore,$1) still resolves to
> delete(hstore,text) when the type of $1 is not specified, so there's
> no compatibility issue there that I can see. (I'm not sure I
> understand _why_ it resolves to that rather than being ambiguous...)
Right, but it does seem like it might be the best choice for now. I'd
add a regression test to make sure it stays that way.
> David> So then it's negligible for new values?
>
> Yes. (One bit test, done inline)
Excellent, thanks.
David
