On 2017/03/05 16:20, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I notice also that
> \d+ <tablename>
> does not show which partitions have subpartitions.
Do you mean showing just whether a partition is itself partitioned or
showing its partitions and so on (because those partitions may themselves
be partitioned)? Maybe, we could do the former.
> I'm worried that these things illustrate something about the catalog
> representation that we may need to improve, but I don't have anything
> concrete to say on that at present.
Perhaps. As Ashutosh said though, it does not seem like a big problem in
this particular case.
Thanks,
Amit
