Gregory Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Would it be possible to make a whole new protocol message for EXPLAIN results?
I'm really unwilling to get into that. For one thing, that would
absolutely positively break *all* use of EXPLAIN from un-fixed clients,
whether you were trying to stop early or not.
> The reason I'm suggesting that is because it might make it easier to implement
> the SIGINFO handler that sends incremental EXPLAIN results on demand that I
> was describing earlier.
Doesn't matter, because that's not happening ;-) SIGINFO isn't
portable, and even if it were, a signal handler couldn't possibly
generate EXPLAIN output (remember those catalog accesses).
regards, tom lane
