Re: autovacuum: recommended? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: autovacuum: recommended?
Date
Msg-id 29751.1195485798@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum: recommended?  (Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>)
Responses Re: autovacuum: recommended?  (Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-performance
Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> FWIW, 20k rows isn't all that big, so I'm assuming that the
> descriptions make the table very wide. Unless those descriptions are
> what's being updated frequently, I suggest you put those in a
> separate table (vertical partitioning). That will make the main table
> much easier to vacuum, as well as reducing the impact of the high
> churn rate.

Uh, you do realize that the TOAST mechanism does that pretty much
automatically?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum: recommended?
Next
From: Jean-David Beyer
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum: recommended?