Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 30.04.21 05:22, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 15:31, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> So if you could produce a separate patch that adds the
>>> _ENABLED guards targeting PG14 (and PG13), that would be helpful.
>>
>> Here is a proposed patch for this.
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> Applies and builds fine on master and (with default fuzz) on
> REL_13_STABLE. Works as expected.

committed