> 21 дек. 2021 г., в 10:23, Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru> написал(а):
>
> <v1-0001-bufmgr-do-not-acquire-two-partition-lo.patch>
Hi Yura!
I've took a look into the patch. The idea seems reasonable to me: clearing\evicting old buffer and placing new one seem
tobe different units of work, there is no need to couple both partition locks together. And the claimed performance
impactis fascinating! Though I didn't verify it yet.
On a first glance API change in BufTable does not seem obvious to me. Is void *oldelem actually BufferTag * or maybe
BufferLookupEnt*? What if we would like to use or manipulate with oldelem in future?
And the name BufTableFreeDeleted() confuses me a bit. You know, in C we usually free(), but in C++ we delete [], and
herewe do both... Just to be sure.
Thanks!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
