Re: Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows)
Date
Msg-id 2929.1064499424@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows)  (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>)
Responses Re: Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows)  ("Keith Bottner" <kbottner@comcast.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com> writes:
> FWIW, I've got a threaded version of the WIN32_DEV branch more or less
> "running" (it is a terrible hack job, so NO, no patches... yet :-), as a
> proof of concept. Still a work in progress (ok, I've qualified it enough),
> but it is showing enough promise to convince me that threading is the way to
> go for the Win32 port.

How are you dealing with the issue of wanting some static variables to
be per-thread and others not?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Natoli
Date:
Subject: Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is this a commit problem?