Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?
Date
Msg-id 29144.978150058@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?  ("Thomas T. Thai" <tom@minnesota.com>)
List pgsql-general
"Thomas T. Thai" <tom@minnesota.com> writes:
> PLEASE NOTE: I'm brand new to PostgreSQL as of today. I've just moved from
> MySQL because it's not stable on NetBSD/Alpha. I don't know enough about
> pgsql to see if these failed test would make it unstable for production.

Postgres 7.0.* will not work very well on Alpha unless you apply Ryan
Kirkpatrick's patch set (I forget the URL offhand, but dig around in our
archives and you'll find it).  7.1 should be a lot better.  If you'd
like to help out testing 7.1, please grab current sources from the CVS
server, or grab a snapshot tarball dated tomorrow or later.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mike Mascari
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Failed Statements within Transactions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Error opening pgaccess