"amol" <amol@mithi.com> writes:
> explain analyze select attached_info.id from attached_tag_list,
> attached_info
> where
> attached_tag_list.attached_tag = 265
> and
> attached_tag_list.id = attached_info.id
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..165349.50 rows=114 width=16) (actual
> time=117.14..8994.60 rows=15 loops=1)
> -> Index Scan using ix_attached_tag_list_id on attached_tag_list
> (cost=0.00..111.13 rows=96 width=12) (actual time=0.12..0.66 rows=15
> loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on attached_info (cost=0.00..1211.53 rows=33553 width=4)
> (actual time=3.67..197.98 rows=33553 loops=15)
> Total runtime: 8994.92 msec
> - I have already indexed attached_info on id using following query
> CREATE INDEX attached_info_Index_1 ON attached_info(id) ;
Hm. I'd have expected an index scan too. Maybe the two id columns are
not of the same datatype?
regards, tom lane
