Re: "AS" by the syntax of table reference.(8.4 proposal) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: "AS" by the syntax of table reference.(8.4 proposal) |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | 29049.1202587650@sss.pgh.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: "AS" by the syntax of table reference.(8.4 proposal) (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Responses |
Re: "AS" by the syntax of table reference.(8.4 proposal)
|
| List | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Sure, just like a + + b is ambiguous. We define an arbitrary choice and tell
> people to put parentheses if they want the other. It's not too hard to write
> SELECT (a +) b, ...
> if you want an alias. Besides, nobody uses postfix expressions anyways. It
> would be a pain if it worked the other way and you had to write (a + b) all
> the time.
Hm, well, now that you mention it we already have provisions to
discriminate against the postfix-op case when things are ambiguous.
So really this is a precedence problem, which leads to the attached
proposal for a patch. This still has the problem of only allowing
IDENT for AS-less column labels, but at least it avoids restricting
the expression.
regards, tom lane
Index: gram.y
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/parser/gram.y,v
retrieving revision 2.606
diff -c -r2.606 gram.y
*** gram.y 7 Feb 2008 21:07:55 -0000 2.606
--- gram.y 9 Feb 2008 20:01:36 -0000
***************
*** 477,482 ****
--- 477,483 ---- %nonassoc BETWEEN %nonassoc IN_P %left POSTFIXOP /* dummy for postfix Op rules */
+ %nonassoc IDENT /* to support target_el without AS */ %left Op OPERATOR /*
multi-characterops and user-defined operators */ %nonassoc NOTNULL %nonassoc ISNULL
***************
*** 8705,8711 **** | target_list ',' target_el { $$ = lappend($1, $3); } ;
- /* AS is not optional because shift/red conflict with unary ops */ target_el: a_expr AS ColLabel {
$$ = makeNode(ResTarget);
--- 8706,8711 ----
***************
*** 8714,8719 ****
--- 8714,8735 ---- $$->val = (Node *)$1; $$->location = @1; }
+ /*
+ * We support omitting AS only for column labels that aren't
+ * any known keyword. There is an ambiguity against postfix
+ * operators: is "a ! b" an infix expression, or a postfix
+ * expression and a column label? We prefer to resolve this
+ * as an infix expression, which we accomplish by assigning
+ * IDENT a precedence higher than POSTFIXOP.
+ */
+ | a_expr IDENT
+ {
+ $$ = makeNode(ResTarget);
+ $$->name = $2;
+ $$->indirection = NIL;
+ $$->val = (Node *)$1;
+ $$->location = @1;
+ } | a_expr { $$ = makeNode(ResTarget);
pgsql-hackers by date: