Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 26.03.24 00:43, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I looked at the musl source code you identified and confirmed that
>> only the LD_LIBRARY_PATH string is remembered in a static variable;
>> LD_PRELOAD is only accessed locally in that initialization function.
>> So we only need to do the attached. (I failed to resist the
>> temptation to rewrite the comments.)
> Yeah, I was more looking for a comment for posterity for *why* we need
> to preserve this variable in particular. The updated comment looks
> reasonable.
OK, pushed after a bit more comment-fiddling.
regards, tom lane