Version Numbering - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Version Numbering
Date
Msg-id 28F10824-222F-44C0-8A96-42FC8B1DCA35@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Version Numbering
Re: Version Numbering
Re: Version Numbering
List pgsql-hackers
Hackers,

A while ago, I asked if .0 releases could be versioned with three digits instead of two. That is, it would be "8.4.0"
insteadof "8.4". This is to make the format consistent with maintenance releases ("8.4.1", etc.). I thought this was
generallyagreed upon, but maybe not, because I just went to build the latest 9.0 beta and saw that the version number
is"9.0beta4". 

Would it be possible to *always* use three integers? So the next release would be "9.0.0beta5" or "9.0.0rc1"? In
additionto being more consistent, it also means that PostgreSQL would be adhering to Semantic Versioning
(http://semver.org/),which is a very simple format that's internally consistent. I'm planning to require semantic
versioningfor PGXN, and it'd be nice if the core could do the same thing (it will make it nicer for specifying
dependencieson core contrib modules, for example). 

Thanks,

David

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Parallel pg_restore versus dependencies