How does this imply one sequence? Is it guaranteed that for each value
of a, the values of b will be equivalent to all (and only) values of a?
There's plenty of flexibility within postgres for ways to use sequences.
Regardless, I think you need to have (and present) a better idea of
what you're trying to do with your data, which itself might be tedious,
but good data design will save you countless headaches down the road.
-tfo
On Sep 10, 2004, at 7:32 PM, Nick wrote:
> Is it possible to have a sequence across two columns. For example
>
> table1
> +---+---+
> | a | b |
> +---+---+
> | 1 | 1 |
> | 1 | 2 |
> | 1 | 3 |
> | 2 | 1 |
> | 2 | 2 |
> | 2 | 3 |
> | 3 | 1 |
> | 3 | 2 |
> | 3 | 3 |
> +---+---+
>
> Would I have to create a new sequence for every unique 'a' column?
> That seems pretty tedious. -Nick
