Re: another plperl bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: another plperl bug
Date
Msg-id 28994.1101237166@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: another plperl bug  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:37:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I would add these test cases to the regression test were it not that the
>> addresses are machine-dependent...

> I haven't looked into how the regression tests work -- can test
> output be post-processed before comparision with expected results?

No, it's just a plain "diff".  If it seemed worth the trouble,
I'd put the hackery right into the SQL:
select perl_func()::text ~ 'ARRAY\\(0x[0-9a-f]+\\)';

but it doesn't really seem worth it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Poole
Date:
Subject: Re: another plperl bug
Next
From: jseymour@linxnet.com (Jim Seymour)
Date:
Subject: Re: OpenBSD/Sparc status