Re: [SQL] finding the most recent records - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [SQL] finding the most recent records
Date
Msg-id 28978.925488608@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to finding the most recent records  (JT Kirkpatrick <jt-kirkpatrick@mpsllc.com>)
List pgsql-sql
JT Kirkpatrick <jt-kirkpatrick@mpsllc.com> writes:
> "field1 datetime not null default text 'now'".  you'll only run into a
> problem if more than one record is inserted AT THE EXACT SAME SECOND
> -- but postgres will just put the same timestamp in there (don't
> define the field as unique).

Actually, I think "now" means "the time at the start of the current
transaction", so that you'll get the same timestamp applied to all
records inserted within a transaction.  This is good for some things;
for example, you can insert related records into several different
tables and expect them to have the same timestamp, even though the
operation may take more than a second to complete.  But it does mean
that you can't expect a timestamp to serve as a unique ID.  (Use a
SERIAL column for that, instead...)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: JT Kirkpatrick
Date:
Subject: RE: [SQL] combining a single field in two tables into one column.
Next
From: Chris Bitmead
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] combining a single field in two tables into one column.