Re: Announcing Veil - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Announcing Veil
Date
Msg-id 28957.1128657292@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Announcing Veil  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Announcing Veil
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd be willing to add the proposed patch in 8.1 (style note:
>> NUM_USER_DEFINED_LWLOCKS should be set in pg_config_manual.h not
>> lwlock.h).

> Shouldn't it be something we can put in postgresql.conf?

No more than any of the other entries in pg_config_manual.h.
With only one known request for a user-allocated lock, it's hard to
justify the overhead of a GUC variable.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Announcing Veil
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Announcing Veil