Re: Announcing Veil - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Announcing Veil
Date
Msg-id 200510070352.j973qTO10804@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Announcing Veil  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Announcing Veil
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I don't see NUM_USER_DEFINED_LWLOCKS defined in 8.0 or 8.1, so what
> > system do you propose to allow you to set this value?
> 
> I'd be willing to add the proposed patch in 8.1 (style note:
> NUM_USER_DEFINED_LWLOCKS should be set in pg_config_manual.h not
> lwlock.h).  However, it's certainly not going to magically appear in
> existing releases, so I dunno if that'd make Marc happy or not.

Shouldn't it be something we can put in postgresql.conf?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Announcing Veil
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Announcing Veil