Re: Announcing Veil - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Announcing Veil
Date
Msg-id 200510070356.j973uKN12189@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Announcing Veil  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Announcing Veil
Re: Announcing Veil
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'd be willing to add the proposed patch in 8.1 (style note:
> >> NUM_USER_DEFINED_LWLOCKS should be set in pg_config_manual.h not
> >> lwlock.h).
> 
> > Shouldn't it be something we can put in postgresql.conf?
> 
> No more than any of the other entries in pg_config_manual.h.
> With only one known request for a user-allocated lock, it's hard to
> justify the overhead of a GUC variable.

True, but are people going to recompile PostgreSQL to use this feature?
Seems they would have to.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Announcing Veil
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Announcing Veil