Re: Vacuum/visibility is busted - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Vacuum/visibility is busted
Date
Msg-id 28936.1360219295@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Vacuum/visibility is busted  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> While stress testing Pavan's 2nd pass vacuum visibility patch, I realized
> that vacuum/visibility was busted.  But it wasn't his patch that busted it.
>  As far as I can tell, the bad commit was in the
> range 692079e5dcb331..168d3157032879

> Since a run takes 12 to 24 hours, it will take a while to refine that
> interval.

Just eyeballing the commit logs, I'd have to guess that
0ac5ad5134f2769c (the foreign-key-locks patch) is the only change in
that range that seems like it might account for a visibility-ish bug.
If you're lacking patience for a bisection run, try that one first.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Vacuum/visibility is busted
Next
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs