Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 3:28 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> It'd probably be reasonable to file down that sharp edge by instead
>> specifying that TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds will clamp overflowing
>> differences to LONG_MAX. Maybe there should be a clamp on the underflow
>> side too ... but should it be to LONG_MIN or to zero?
> That got me curious... Why did WaitLatch() use long in the first
> place?
Good question. It's not a great choice, because of the inherent
platform specificity. OTOH, I'm not sure it's worth the pain
to change now.
regards, tom lane
