Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Date
Msg-id 28853.1131821704@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
>> I was hoping to avoid forcing source-code changes, but something like
>> that might be the best solution.  Anyone think it's unreasonable?

> Alternativly, you could make it optional for a release (print warning
> that magic block wasn't found). Next release require it.

What's the point of waiting?  We'd be forcing people to add it sooner
or later, so why not sooner?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Cursor estimated row count