Re: Variadic aggregates vs. project policy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Variadic aggregates vs. project policy
Date
Msg-id 28790.1377918125@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Variadic aggregates vs. project policy  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Uh, the pg_dump part checks for version 80400, shouldn't it be 90400?

The reasoning there is that 8.4 is where we added
pg_get_function_arguments(), so this dumping code should work against that
server version or later.  (Oh, memo to self: test that.)  It's true that
pre-9.4 servers are not going to produce any useful extra info by using
pg_get_function_arguments() on an aggregate; but the general idea of this
patch is to make the aggregate-related code look more like the
plain-function-related code, so using the same version cutoffs in both
cases seemed to make sense.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Variadic aggregates vs. project policy
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.4] row level security