Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Well, as worded, it says we have to group by everything, which is not
> true in 9.1, so I figured let's see what feedback we get and we can add
> a new one if we want, but our old argument is invalid, since we did
> implement part of what we said we wouldn't. ;-)
Uh, no. What we said we wouldn't implement is "Indeterminate behavior
for the GROUP BY clause". We haven't implemented any part of that.
regards, tom lane