Re: SQL:2011 application time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paul Jungwirth
Subject Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date
Msg-id 28522855-4fcb-4309-8a81-6765a30a24fa@illuminatedcomputing.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL:2011 application time  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/12/25 07:23, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I committed your patch on Sunday, and now it's about 72 hours later.
> 
> I've been observing this on cfbot for some time.  Before the patch, you could go to cfbot at any 
> time and find between 5 and 10 test failures from this problem.  And now there are none.  So I'm 
> calling provisional success on this.

That's great! It's sort of unsatisfying though---and unnerving. I wish when the test failed we knew 
what the oids were for the RESTRICT constraint and the just-dropped NO ACTION constraint. (There's 
no way to get that after the fact, is there?) I probably won't keep putting time into this, but it 
seems like there must still be a hard-to-hit bug in the code for caching query plans. Since the 
behavior disappeared, it is more evidence that that's where the real problem lies.

Yours,

-- 
Paul              ~{:-)
pj@illuminatedcomputing.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Date:
Subject: Re: TAP test command_fails versus command_fails_like
Next
From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Date:
Subject: Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber