Re: fstat vs. lseek - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: fstat vs. lseek
Date
Msg-id 28447.1312824567@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fstat vs. lseek  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Not really.  I do have root access to a 64-core box at the moment, and
> I could probably get permission to reboot it, but if it didn't come
> back on-line that would be awkward.

Red Hat has some test hardware that I can use (... pokes around ...)
Hmm, this one looks promising:

Memory    NUMA Nodes
64348 MB     4
 Cpu
Vendor        Model Name        Family            Model    Stepping    Speed    Processors    Cores    Sockets
Hyper
GenuineIntel     Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4860 @ 2.27GHz     6     47     2     1064.0     80         40     4
True

If you can wrap something up to the point where someone else can
run it, I'll give it a shot.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Common object property boards
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: fstat vs. lseek