Re: pl/pgsql and arrays[] - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pl/pgsql and arrays[]
Date
Msg-id 28437.1323101461@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/pgsql and arrays[]  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pl/pgsql and arrays[]
List pgsql-general
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> return next in function that returns composite type needs a composite
> variable. Other cases are not supported there.

Plain "return" has the same limitation, but this really ought to be
fixed sometime.  Composite types have been getting closer and closer
to first-class status since plpgsql was written.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Cédric Villemain
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_standby: How to check in which state the server is currently?
Next
From: "Francisco Figueiredo Jr."
Date:
Subject: Re: What's the best way in Postgres9 to store a bunch of arbitrary boolean values for a row?