Re: VACUUM FULL for performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: VACUUM FULL for performance
Date
Msg-id 28402.1286461313@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM FULL for performance  (Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists@yahoo.it>)
List pgsql-general
Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists@yahoo.it> writes:
>> I also  recommend reindexing any table that has been VACUUM FULLed.

> Mmmh, from the docs I get that in 9.0 a "vacuum full" rewrites the whole table,
> so I expect the indexes to be re-created anyway... so a reindexing would
> be totally useless.

Any discussion of VACUUM FULL has to recognize that 9.0's implementation
of it is completely different from all prior versions.  It still has
disadvantages, but not the ones that were there before.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.4.16 is creating strange files under /var/lib/pgsql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_relation_size / could not open relation with OID #