Re: Additional Statistics Hooks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Additional Statistics Hooks
Date
Msg-id 2822.1520894672@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Additional Statistics Hooks  (Mat Arye <mat@timescale.com>)
Responses Re: Additional Statistics Hooks  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Additional Statistics Hooks  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Mat Arye <mat@timescale.com> writes:
> So the use-case is an analytical query like

> SELECT date_trunc('hour', time) AS MetricMinuteTs, AVG(value) as avg
> FROM hyper
> WHERE time >= '2001-01-04T00:00:00' AND time <= '2001-01-05T01:00:00'
> GROUP BY MetricMinuteTs
> ORDER BY MetricMinuteTs DESC;

> Right now this query will choose a much-less-efficient GroupAggregate plan
> instead of a HashAggregate. It will choose this because it thinks the
> number of groups
> produced here is 9,000,000 because that's the number of distinct time
> values there are.
> But, because date_trunc "buckets" the values there will be about 24 groups
> (1 for each hour).

While it would certainly be nice to have better behavior for that,
"add a hook so users who can write C can fix it by hand" doesn't seem
like a great solution.  On top of the sheer difficulty of writing a
hook function, you'd have the problem that no pre-written hook could
know about all available functions.  I think somehow we'd need a way
to add per-function knowledge, perhaps roughly like the protransform
feature.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: explain with costs in subselect.sql
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: unique indexes on partitioned tables