Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )
Date
Msg-id 28063.1293477477@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )  (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> writes:
> I hope that we don't make the mistake of not checking for collisions
> with C++0x keywords, for which GCC 4.3+ has partial support. The new
> standard is almost complete, so it will probably become a lot more
> relevant soon. There are quite a few new keywords in C++0x, including:

[ shrug... ]  If it's not a keyword according to popularly available
tools, then I really have zero interest in worrying about it.  This
is an exercise in making the headers useful in practice, not in academic
standards conformance.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )