Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Date
Msg-id 27991.1131812331@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> Sure, CATALOG_VERSION isn't that useful, but it's the only thing in the
> header files that gives any kind of indication what version you're
> compiling against. PG_VERSION is a string, which diminishes its
> usefulness considerably.

How so?  All we care about is being able to (1) compare for equality,
and (2) print out something useful in error messages.  I claim that
PG_VERSION does #1 equally well and #2 better.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload