Re: contrib promotion? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: contrib promotion?
Date
Msg-id 27943.1152895039@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib promotion?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't see a strong need for moving pgcrypto into core, and there's at
>> least one argument against it: if someone needs a crypto-free version of
>> postgres for use someplace with benighted laws, they would be screwed.

> Doesn't our inclusion of md5() pretty much blow that argument away? 

No: md5 is hashing, not encryption.  The difference is that you can't
retrieve the original plaintext from a hash.  That is a very large
difference in the eyes of most munitions laws --- encryption is useful
for spies, hashing not so much.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib promotion?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Forcing wal rotation