Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> How would be the behavior of the following command sequence ?
> begin;
> declare myc cursor for select * from t1 limit 1;
> fetch in myc;
> fetch in myc;
> Could the last fetch return a row ?
As the code now stands, the second fetch would return nothing.
I think this is clearly what any reasonable person would expect
given the LIMIT 1 clause.
LIMIT ALL is a different story, because there's no semantic difference
between writing LIMIT ALL and writing no limit clause at all. We have
the option to create a distinction for planning purposes, however.
Question is do we need one?
regards, tom lane
