Re: WIP: Automatic view update rules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WIP: Automatic view update rules
Date
Msg-id 27380.1232153930@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Automatic view update rules  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> CASE will be quite bad for optimization, and then you might as well go 
> with IS DISTINCT FROM, which is just as bad but simpler.

Definitely avoid CASE if you can.  Although the planner currently knows
nothing about IS DISTINCT FROM, that's fixable in principle.  We'll
probably never be able to optimize CASE conditions very much because of
their special evaluation rules.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Status Report on Hot Standby
Next
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Status Report on SE-PostgreSQL