Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I have only been running nightly paralell regression runs since June 27,
> so it is possible that the paralell regression was broken in February,
> fixed in May, then broken some time after that.
Any further progress on this?
My best theory at the moment is that we have a problem with relcache
entry creation failing if it's interrupted by an SI inval message at
just the right time. I don't much want to grovel through six months
worth of changelog entries looking for candidate mistakes, though.
regards, tom lane
