"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:16:35AM +0200, Ulrich Neumann wrote:
>> At the moment there isn't ln at all. Just making a copy of the binary
>> is a problem because the binary name is compiled in the binary
>> and if you use srgc[0] NetWare reports "postgres" instead of
>> "postmaster".
> O.K., that just means that instead of 'cp' it'll nead an ugly hack to the
> Makefiles that links a seperate executable with the second name. That's
> better than an ugly hack in the mainline executable code, I suppose.
Should we even do that? What is srgc[0], and why should we care whether
it can tell the difference between postgres and postmaster?
regards, tom lane
